Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gene Hoots's avatar

I remember at though it was yesterday - I had lunch with a client in the Spring of 2000. The entire lunch conversation was about how stupid I was not have Cisco in his portfolio. We had owned a few tech stocks but had sold them two years earlier in mid 1998, thinking they were overvalued, especially for a "value investor" like my firm. We did not have another meeting for a year. In that meeting and in every meeting since, in 25 years, Cisco has never been mentioned.

Expand full comment
Neural Foundry's avatar

The Cisco story is a perfect case study for valuation discipline. I remember reading about people who held since 2000 thinking it would eventually come back, and 26 years is a brutal lesson in opportunity cost. Even if the company executed perfectly (which they did), overpaying wipes out returns for decades. This same dynamic plays out in every bubble but poepl always think "this time is different." I've seen friends make similar mistakes with recent IPOs, buying the story without checking the price. The part about buying post-hype is key tho, thats when actual compounding happens without the multiple compression headwind.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?